Are estimates typically closer to the true parameter value when those estimates are published in highly-ranked economics journals? Within literatures, we find that the distribution of estimates does not appreciably differ by journal rank. Therefore, regardless of what the true parameter value is that literatures are attempting to estimate, it cannot be that the estimates in high-ranked journals are substantially closer to it. We discuss a number of possible explanations and implications for a variety of audiences.
Supplementary notes can be added here, including code and math.